AI rejects cabinet minister: The recruitment paradox confusing today’s job market
The recruitment industry sends mixed signals as AI selection and skills-based hiring compete
Is it just me, or are job seekers receiving contradictory messages about what employers and recruiters truly value?
While many companies publicly champion skills-based hiring, their automated recruitment systems often filter out qualified candidates who don’t fit traditional career or education paths. This creates a disconnect between stated values and actual practices.
In this article, we discuss several topics:
- How AI recruitment tools and CV scanners are rejecting qualified candidates with non-traditional backgrounds
- The significant gap between companies claiming to value skills-based hiring (51% of hiring managers), while their systems still prioritise traditional credentials
- How transferable skills are theoretically valued but often missed by automated processes
- The conflict between what recruiters say they want versus what their systems are programmed to select
AI recruitment tools reject former cabinet minister
Former Welsh Secretary David TC Davies, who lost his seat in the 2024 general election, has experienced firsthand the rigid nature of modern recruitment technology. Despite his 19 years as an MP and cabinet-level experience, Davies claims he has been automatically rejected for jobs by Artificial Intelligence (AI) software because he lacks a university degree.
“Clearly when you submit a CV nobody human looks at them at all – and if you have a slightly odd CV, which I have, then you have no chance,” Davies told the BBC.
In one particularly telling instance, when asked for his previous manager’s details, Davies listed “Rishi Sunak” as his line manager with the job title “Prime Minister of the United Kingdom.” Unable to provide the former PM’s phone number, he was promptly rejected by the system.
Davies warns that employers using applicant tracking systems may be missing diverse talent by filtering out candidates with unconventional backgrounds. “They’re going to recruit all the same sort of people – they’re going to end up with template people,” he stated.
Skills-based hiring is on the rise, yet implementation lags
Ironically, as Davies encounters barriers from automated systems, new research from Indeed reveals that 51% of hiring managers believe skills-based hiring is more important than degrees, job titles, or years of experience. Yet some jobs (the majority of which are outside Silicon Valley) won’t even consider you without a university degree.
Matt Burney, Senior Strategic Advisor at Indeed, explains the contradiction in an exclusive conversation with HR and recruitment news site Unleash: “Despite promising signs that employers are more aware of skills-first hiring strategies, our research shows that many are still relying on degrees and education requirements to make hiring decisions.”
Indeed’s research indicates significant confusion remains, with 55% of those polled expressing a lack of understanding about skills-based hiring processes, while 52% continue to show unwavering trust in degrees as a proxy for quality.
Hiring intentions v. practice
The disconnect between stated hiring preferences and actual recruitment practices reveals that the world of work and recruitment practices are in transition. While companies may genuinely value practical skills and experience, their recruitment infrastructure often remains anchored in traditional credentials.
Indeed’s research found that of businesses claiming to have a defined skills-first strategy, only 13% have actually removed degree requirements, and the same percentage have reduced experience requirements.
“This trust proxy is limiting employers’ pool of talent and ruling out candidates who are qualified for open vacancies based on their skills but may not have the right education requirements or qualifications,” Burney notes.
What job seekers really value and why
The research also revealed that 57% of job seekers would accept a less competitive salary if a role offered better learning and development opportunities. This suggests candidates are prioritising skill development over traditional markers of success.
Transferable skills such as the ability to work well with different people (90%), critical thinking and problem-solving (90%), and the ability to learn quickly (89%) were identified as the most desirable qualities among hiring managers.
Recruitment process rethink
Experts suggest that companies serious about skills-based hiring need to fundamentally rethink their recruitment processes, particularly when it comes to automated systems.
“For employers who don’t know where to start with implementing skills-first hiring, rethinking job requirements is a great first step,” advises Burney. “Clarifying the skills needed for roles and highlighting them clearly in job postings will allow candidates to apply based on the skills they know they possess, regardless of where the skills were acquired.”
As labour markets remain in limbo in line with global economic uncertainty, bridging the gap between the rhetoric and reality of skills-based hiring could benefit both employers and candidates. Candidates like hiring companies want to increase retention and prevent qualified individuals from being filtered out before a human even sees their application.
Davies’ experience serves as a cautionary tale about the limitations of current recruitment technology. As he noted, the skills required in his pre-political career “required a PhD in common sense”
Arguably, qualities that automated systems often fail to detect.
What are your thoughts on the subject?
Get freelancer recruitment news, money, health and lifestyle tips you can’t get anywhere else.
Join the thousands of freelancers in our news community today!
Sign up for our newsletter
